Game 12: #2 Seed Content Maven Versus #7 Seed Writer’s Notes
April 7, 2008 by J.C. Hewitt
The Matchup
#2 Seed Content Maven has the numbers on its side with more visitors and more posts. Can #7 seed Writer’s Notes score another win for the little guys?
Introductions
Content Maven
The second-seeded Content Maven is the blog of freelance writer and editor Meryl Evans. It is part of a larger site promoting Evans’ services. Additionally, Evans runs a gaming blog on the same site. This writing blog has been around for a long time and is well established. The main topics are content creation and writing on the web.
Writer’s Notes
Seventh-seeded Writer’s Notes is the blog of Jeanne Dininni, a freelance writer who also contributes to many other web sites. The focus is on information, encouragement and inspiration for writers.
Archives
Content Maven
Content Maven’s archives stretch back to June of 2000. That is the oldest set of archives I have encountered yet. Most of the very early posts are of a more personal nature (the concept of professional blogging hadn’t caught on yet). CM posts frequently, with a nearly daily pace. There is an archive page as well as a featured articles page and related articles links appear at the bottom of each post.
Result: CM scores a three pointer.
Writer’s Notes
The archives at WN go back to January of 2007. The posting frequency is about 3 to 4 posts a week. There is an archives system that can be helpful, but it can be a bit confusing. Many of her articles are about writing for the web and about the emotions involved in writing.
Result: WN sinks a two-pointer off the glass.
CM jumps out to an early 3-2 lead.
Design
Content Maven
The CM design pushes the main blog to a subsidiary page, although the main page does display the most recent entries. The design is low on clutter. It isn’t fancy, but there are a couple of nice professional touches such as a well-designed masthead graphic.
Result: CM drives to the basket for two points.
Writer’s Notes
WN is having difficulties with the design of the site. In fact, the latest blog post is a series of updates about the problems. WN uses a blogging service called Orble. The dark blue text on a light blue background (used for links) can be difficult to read. I took the liberty of looking at some other Orble blogs, and I couldn’t find a single one that was pleasant to look at. Clearly there is a problem with Orble placing ads in distracting places.
Result: WN gets a point from the free throw line.
CM extends its lead to 5-3. WN is going to have to make up some ground to stay in this.
Usability and Navigation
Content Maven
CM uses excerpts from the individual blog entries on the main blog page, which increases the number of entries you can view but prevents you from reading the latest posts without clicking on the individual entry. That adds an extra click to the process. The central features are all easy to find and access. You can subscribe to her newsletter or to subscribe to one of several syndication feeds. You can use the share this feature to add her posts to social media.
Result: CM lays in a two-pointer.
Writer’s Notes
WN performs better on the features side than it does on the attractiveness of the design. The only downside is that there are so many options that it can be difficult to find the ones that you want (the design doesn’t help). Among the features are: several feed options, a list of spotlight posts, a list of recent posts, a list of popular posts, an archive feature and a promise to reply to all comments.
Result: WN shoots a short jumper for two.
CM maintains its lead, 7-5.
Purpose
Content Maven
CM bills itself as, Things wordy, geeky, and webby. It should be noted that, in addition to content, Evans writes about games, especially PC-based games. She uses a different page for that topic though, so it isn’t blended with her content discussion. With a purpose as broad as CM gives itself, it is pretty easy to make all of the postings fit that purpose. Writing and blogging appear to be the primary topics though.
Result: CM makes a ten-footer for two.
Writer’s Notes
Dininni makes a genuine effort to be help other writers. She has a policy of responding to all comments, which makes it easy to interact with her. You get the feeling that Dininni genuinely wants you to succeed. That is one of my favorite things about her site.
Result: WN scores a three pointer
WN makes its move, gaining some ground. it is now 9-8 in favor of Content Maven.
Personality
Content Maven
Evans has a nice conversational style to most of her posts. You get a feel for who she is and the things she likes. She isn’t shy about giving her opinions. I don’t think her personality drives the site though.
Result: CM puts in another two-point shot.
Writer’s Notes
The purpose of WN is Helping Writers Follow Their Dreams Through Information, Inspiration, and Encouragement! The site holds true to that goal. Several of Dininni’s recent articles are about inspiration, so that is still a topic that gets excellent coverage. She provides solid information in her articles and she is also quick to discuss other writing sites and make recommendations. There is no doubt that she wants other writers to succeed.
Result: Dininni hits another three point shot.
It is all tied up, 11-11 as we move into the final round.
Five Most Recent Posts
Content Maven
- 4 Steps for Dealing with Mistakes
- Links: 2008-04-04
- Question Your Work
- 7 Tips to a Good Twitter Experience
- Short Introductions on Web Pages
With the exception of her link-love entry, Evan’s recent blogs are all of a how-to or advisory nature. She has a nice habit of giving tips and then illuminating them with examples from her own experience. If you are a writer who concentrates their efforts on the web, you will probably find her articles top be informative and useful.
Result: CM lands a three-pointer.
Writer’s Notes
- Technical Difficulties
- Inspiration Series, Part 1: People, Positive and Negative
- Writer’s Notes’ Recognition for March ‘08 Comments
- Join the Rush! Buy The Age of Conversation, Give Sick Kids the Gift of Life
- Conventional Writing Wisdom: It May Be Conventional, But Is It Wisdom?
Dininni’s article on inspiration is a good exploration of the topic, and her article on conventional writing wisdom is similarly worthwhile. Her post supporting the book Age of Conversation would have been better if it has contained a review of the material. As it was, it seems mainly promotional in nature, although the proceeds do go to charity. Her post thanking her commenters is a good touch for her community. Her post discussing the difficulties she is having with Orble demonstrates how difficult it can be for bloggers who rely on services.
Result: WN pulls up for a two-pointer.
The Content Maven edges out Writing Notes 14-13 in a tight, tight contest.
Post Game Analysis
Second seeded Content Maven survived a tougher than anticipated first-round matchup against Writer’s Notes. Longevity and design worked in CM’s favor, helping it outlast the community-based approach of WN. WN was severely hampered by poor design. So far, sites that rely on blogging networks such as Blogspot, B5 and Orble have had a lot of trouble making up for the design problems that come with these services. Without the design problems, this match would very likely have ended in an upset.
What They Can Work On
Content Maven
Content Maven puts out good articles on an attractive site with plenty of traffic. Strangely though, there are very few comments on CM’s posts. That lack of community wasn’t a factor in the first round, but may be a problem in future rounds. By the way, that’s a hint of things to come for all of you contestants who are taking the time to read the other reviews.
Writer’s Notes
Writer’s Notes would clearly benefit from an overhaul of its design. I’m not sure what the benefits or Orble are, but the problems associated with them are holding this blog back.




John,
Thanks for including Writer’s Notes in this challenging blog tournament! I appreciate your honesty, your in-depth assessment, and your helpful suggestions for improving my blog.
Many congratulations to Content Maven on her win! Hers is a great blog with consistent and constructive content.
I have to admit that I was very surprised to make it into the contest in the first place with a Google PR of 0!
Thanks again, and good luck to all the other entrants!
Regards,
Jeanne
Great spirit Jeanne. Your classiness shines through!
Congrats Meryl on your win.
I interviewed her Meryl a few months back for my newsletter and she is indeed one talented lady who’s got “the tech thing” down pat.
Maybe we’ll meet in a successive round Meryl.
Yuwanda from “How to Start a Successful Freelance Writing Career” blog
Commiserations Jeanne! I’m glad that John drew out all the strengths of your site including the encouragement and support you offer to others and the community you have built up – not least by investing a lot of energy in commenting on other blogs.
I do personally find the Orble site very frustrating though and I hope you manage to find a way to move on from it that will allow you and your blog to grow and flourish in the future.
Congratulations to the Content Maven for getting through this round.
Joanna
Great info, i appreciate your kind knowledge
Joanna,
Thanks for your kind words. I’ve worked hard over the past 14 months to build up to an average of 350 unique readers a day at Orble, and I’m not yet at the point where I’m ready to move on and leave all my hard work behind to start all over from scratch. Maybe someday. (I don’t even own the Writer’s Notes domain name–Orble does–and it’s just been renewed.) So, for the time being at least, Orble is where I’ll be staying. I simply have too much invested in Writer’s Notes to leave it all behind. I’ll just have to do my best to address the design issues that so seriously affected the outcome of this match.
Thanks again!
Jeanne
Thanks for your kind words, Jeanne. I admit I was nervous from the day I figured out we were matched as I knew you had strong and high quality content. So I’m not surprised it was very close.
John provided excellent and honest analysis. Thank you, John.
[...] survived my first Writing Blog March Madness match up. However, it was no easy win so advancing rounds will be nail-biters. As if the first one [...]
Hi Jeanne,
For calculation purposes, I upgraded all PR Zero sites to PR1, so that it what you were rated at. I am sure if the Google PR system updated more frequently, you would have a real ranking and probably better than PR1. I’m sorry to hear that you did not secure your own domain. That can be a real problem moving forward. Thank you for competing and for being so nice about my commentary.
Thanks, Yuwanda!
Meryl: Appreciate your candid comment! It’s very reassuring!
John: Writer’s Notes had a PR 3 for about 1 month, back in October-November, 2007. After 9 months of blogging, I’d finally achieved Google PR, only to have it taken away during the Google PR fiasco that stripped so many blogs of their hard-won PR. The presumption is that the reason was sponsored reviews; but no one really knows for sure (except Google), because many blogs that didn’t write paid posts also lost PR. It was quite a disappointment, I can tell you!
My blog has been predicted to be PR 5-6, based on number of backlinks, but only Google knows what Google is doing. Much of my content shows up on the first or second page of Google search results, so I’m not quite sure what gives. One thing I’ve learned through all this is not to depend on Google for my sense of self-worth–or for an accurate measurement of my blog’s value!
I’ve just completed an assessment using the Website Grader blog grading tool, which measures a blog’s SEO strength and other variables, and came through with a 90%. And that was with an erroneous Technorati ranking which was twice what my ranking actually is. (The tool used 60,000+ instead of the correct 30,000-).
In case anyone else would like to try the tool, the URL is http://www.websitegrader.com/. It offers a great deal of helpful info about a blog’s strengths and weaknesses.
Thanks again!
Jeanne
Jeanne, my blog was a PR 7 and also shrunk after that fiasco. Nothing makes sense. But I don’t worry about that… I just write and try to provide valuable info to readers.
Yuwanda, thank you much and congrats on your win! As for meeting … perhaps, perhaps. Like with tennis, I take one point at a time. I need to relax and not start shaking in the boots again so soon!
Hi, Meryl!
That’s exactly the way I look at it. After all, providing value to our readers is really what it’s all about.
Take care!
Jeanne
Yuwanda,
Congrats on your win, and best of luck during the remainder of the tournament!
Jeanne